Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and MediaTek Diemnsity 900 are two of the most used mobile processors available for mid-range users in the market. So, In this article, you will get to know about technical specifications, pros & cons of each chip, benchmark results, and the final verdict. Keep reading: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
Performance Score: Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 900
Overall Score Overall performance is evaluated based on the benchmark by comparing it with top tier chipsets.
CPU Score & GPU Score This score is based on the geekbench's single and multi bench and Antutu's CPU/ GPU score.
Technical Specifications: Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 900
| CPU | ||
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78) | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 |
| 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Transistor count | -- | 10 billion |
| GPU | ||
| GPU name | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Valhall 2 |
| GPU frequency | 950MHz | 900 MHz |
| Execution units | - | 4 |
| Shading units | - | 48 |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2 | 2 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
| Multimedia (ISP) | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Memory | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 18.4 Gbit/s |
| Max size | - | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 800 Mbps | Up to 1200 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 210 Mbps | Up to 211 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| Additional Information | ||
| Announced | 2021-10-01 00:00:00 | 2021-05-01 00:00:00 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM6375 | MT6877 |
Pros: Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 900
Although, As we have seen in the performance demographic, MediaTek dimensity 900 seems more powerful and balanced there are many downsides of both the chipset.
Pros of Snapdragon 695
Pros of Dimensity 900
- Better for gaming objectives, since developers tend to optimize more for Snapdragon chipset.
- Better for developers, because it’s easy for ROM developers to optimize it as per device requirements.
- More powerful than Snapdragon 695
- 13.74% more powerful as per the Antutu benchmark
- Overall balanced performance.
- Supports 4K recording
- Faster storage support
Benchmark Result
Antutu 9 Benchmark
| Overall | 403915 | 424294 |
| CPU | 124557 | 115686 |
| GPU | 98379 | 119156 |
| Memory | 68665 | 80995 |
| UX | 110287 | 106823 |
Geekbench 5 Benchmark
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Single Core Score | 704 | 707 |
| Multi Core Score | 2018 | 2149 |
| 3D Mark Graphic Test | 7 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 3D Mark Score | 1207 | 2019 |
Final Verdict
Certainly, Qualcomm’s chipsets are more popular amongst tech-savvy people, MediaTek is slowly catching up for the same. While there are many advantages of using Snapdragon 695, on paper Dimensity 900 has got the lead.
If you’re considering buying a mid-range device then MediaTek Dimensity will outperform the Snapdragon 695. You can either pick Dimensity 900 for better raw performance or select the Snapdragon 695 if you want to have better developer support.
There isn’t a huge gap when we consider the CPU score but GPU is where Dimensity 900 takes a lead. Also, Dimensity 900 supports UFS 3.1 storage which can make the device faster if a smartphone OEM decides to use that.
Dimensity 900 has many advantages such as better memory technology, 4k capture & playback, higher download speed, and whatnot. I would say if you want overall balanced performance and not only raw results then Diemensity 900 is a way to go.
I’ll be writing more such articles in the future so I’d appreciate it if you just turn on the notifications.
